A recent e-mail exchange with a friend found us both quoting that femme fatale of the Algonquin Round Table, Dorothy Parker. We also expressed our admiration for the film, “Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Circle,” where the title character is played by one of cinema’s edgier actresses (employing an even edgier accent), Jennifer Jason Leigh.
In one particular scene where Leigh/Parker is engaging in verbal horseplay at said Round Table with the rest of the wickedly clever literati of 1920’s New York, someone is referred to as a genius, to which our darling Dottie indignantly replies, “No! I don’t think that word is elastic.”
I couldn’t agree with the Missus more. Some words in our culture have taken on a distinctly rubber band quality, stretched past the point of their original power until they’ve become a flaccid assemblage of letters.
One word that’s been unmercifully subjected to the rack is “love.” The Beatles may have been right when they wrote that’s all we need, but do we need it everywhere? Look, I love people, animals, art, literature, music, an ice-cold martini and free bar snacks as much as the next person, but I draw the line when that word is bandied about in business correspondence. Sorry to say, but I have to point the finger at my own gender for this gaffe:
“I’d love to see some copy versions on this by tomorrow” is an e-mail I’d get all too regularly from one of the young women in the marketing/sales department. Or, even more irritating, “I LOVED, LOVED, LOVED the creative you did on the ad campaign!!” Who knew that being praised for a job well done could set my teeth on edge. I half expected to see little hearts in place of the “o”s and often wondered if a love note from one of these “Marie Claire” devotees would take the opposite tack:
“David, I’d really value your input with the creation of a baby. Does convening a quick but productive meeting at ten tonight work for you? Please advise ASAP.”
Another word that’s been shot to hell is “assassination.” This term used to be reserved (and rightly so), for world leaders who were murdered for political reasons (e.g. Kennedy, Lincoln, Sadat, Bhutto, Gandhi). As much as one might like the music of Biggie Smalls, Tupac and John Lennon, they were not the targets of assassination but killed, the first two as a result of a pissing match between rival East Coast-West Coast hip-hop posses, the third at the hands of a deranged maniac. Their deaths were violent, untimely and a blow to the culture, but they didn’t knock political systems off their axis, provoke rioting in the streets or send world markets reeling.
Last, but certainly not the end of the list, is the word “evil.” To persuade all of us good citizens that the end was nigh, George W. Bush referred to the “Axis of Evil” in his State of the Union address in 2002, specifically pointing his finger at Iran, Iraq and North Korea. The dubiously elected “Dubya” may have been ready to soil his tighty whiteys over this triumvirate of mediocre madness, but this Catholic schoolgirl less so. “Evil” is a malevolent talent reserved for God’s only fallen Angel, whether he’s called Satan, Lucifer, Beelzebub or Karl Rove. Hussein was a murderous bastard to be sure, but had as much hate for Muslim extremists as we do, Ahmadinejad is a squinty-eyed cur with a Napoleon complex, and Kim Jong-il is a delusional dwarf who I could take out in a mildly interesting street fight. To confer on any of these two-bit punks the label of “evil” is to debase God’s best and only nemesis.
As Mrs. P. herself would say, “What fresh hell is this?”